Paralysis, slippage, decline: India losing the sheen

The spectacle of  the breast-beating over the underachiever article is so predictable, I’m angry at myself for getting riled up. But it’s so relevant right now to the direction of our country that it seemed a personal affront.

India’s balance of payments hangs by a thread. The theoretical 300 billion dollar reserves of RBI are not available to ensure that we will be able to pay the rising foreign currency bills. The Rupee is in a slide. Admittedly this is not entirely our fault. Its also due to Europeans taking their own economy to the brink of disaster, leading to a rising dollar.

The particular problem with India, however is that we don’t run an export surplus as most of our fellow emerging economies do. If we did, we would see our exports looking attractive to others, and lead to a growth in manufacturing. China has been keeping its currency low for several years to boost industry. We, however, still import more than we export. Singur nano plant controversy showed us all that investment in manufacturing is not very welcome, even from a brand as respectable as the Tatas. There is a huge maoist Red Belt across the belly of Mother India that would make anyone reluctant to invest there. Reform of Labour laws, infrastructure, power, all these things are not yet in place to attract investment in manufacturing. That leaves services.

Most of us think services, and think IT and outsourcing. That’s one part, but not even close to the whole story. One major way to improve things for farmers, producers & consumers, generate large scale employment, and get investment in infrastructure and logistics is via large scale retail. That’s a great place to attract investments to. Oh wait.

See? The few places where people want to put in money, we don’t want them to. So a huge hunk of overseas money in India is short term investments. What we call FIIs, the foreign institutional investors. Now the thing is, they calculate their return on investment in dollars, so every slight fall in rupee means that their returns fall by that much. In the last 3 months, rupee has fallen by 16%. So their returns ought to be be really great for them to even break even. And now we understand why they are taking money out of India.

It gets better. When they take money out, the rupee falls further, as they sell their rupees to buy dollars. Yes, that prompts even more people to take their money out!! Now we get to a slow downward spiral that leads to falling currency and fleeing dollars. That’s exactly where we are.

Which brings us to the politics. The duo of Manmohan & Montek, who are supposedly in charge of the economy, understand all this way too well. They could probably have predicted this path several months ago. Why are we in this position now? The obvious answer is their impotence to act. The deeper answer in my view is the inability of any political party to bring change.

That’s because of several reasons, but the most important in my view is the disinterest of our electorate in engaging with the issues. Even the recent Anna-inspired mobilization was focused on punishment as deterrent. The answer to corruption of the powerful is not to punish them, satisfying as that may be, it’s to reduce their power. No one is talking about a smaller government, we are all for increasing the power of Babus, by a different name of Lokpal.

This means that BJP/local parties are happy to oppose any progress just for the sake of opposing, and Congress will do the same when in opposition. And every election confirms the sad truth that corruption is no bar to winning, provided money/caste/power equations are in your favor.

All this has led to a tirade of articles in thoughtful magazines about the decline in India. There have even been suggestions to place Indonesia as the ‘I’ in BRIC. But we woke when Time magazine put our MMS on the cover and put a one word description of his lack of achievements. Subtlety gayi tel lene.

The wrath of congress loyalists over one article is infuriating, but sadly predictable. Even more infantile was Outlook magazine taking out a cover of Obama with underachiever written next to it. Really? This is the level our public discourse has descended to?

That makes me sad. And angry.

Advertisements

The Man Who Hated Tears

1988, maybe 1989. Anand was to be shown on Doordarshan. I was so frustrated with its hero because of all the trash I had seen so far that and so angry at my mom asking me to see this film that I left the house when the film was to be aired and like any typical teenager would, spent the evening in a library. (What do you mean that’s not where teenagers typically hangout?)

Stubborn behavior is inherited it seems, and mom had it too. She recorded the whole film, using up a whole VHS cassette in the process. A few days later, I found myself choked as Johnny Walker stumbled out of a room crying at the imminent loss of a man he hardly knew. Anand has been with me ever since- the character as well as the film. And I just couldn’t bring myself to actively dislike the guy who played him, no matter how hard I tried, and no matter how hard he tried.

A few years later, I watched his golden years films, this time open to like them. And I did, sort of. No matter how much I saw the traces of his later overacting, I also saw a guy with style and some charisma. Watch Amar Prem, for instance. The narrative lights up whenever he’s on screen. Even when he is overacting to heavens and beyond, telling Pushpa about he hates tears.

No one can dispute his flaws. He is the one actor my generation loves to hate, and not without reason. But he is also the first superstar. I find them hard to fathom the reason for that most of the times, but sometimes catch a glimpse when watching him sing ‘Mere sapnon ki rani’ with that weird combination of restrain, enthusiasm, charm, hamming and good looks.

PS: Miss you mummy. And amongst the million other things, we can now add Anand and Bawarchi to thank you for.

Marriage Material

Its a film written by Imtiaz Ali, and directed by Homi Adajania, who made Being Cyrus. So my expectations were sky high. Any criticism that ensues should be seen in that context. It is a film with several great moments, some comic, some poignant. Some of long single take shots are fantastic, and Deepika is brilliant. Having said all that let me tell you why I smelled something slightly spoilt at its core.

In one of the scenes, Veronica, played by Deepika, says that she saw something in Gautam (Saif) when no one else did. In fact I couldn’t see it even after watching the entire film. Our “hero” picks up girls, apparently successfully, using stale internet jokes. Has a casual relationship with Veronica, while he lives in her house, and pretends to be engaged to the more traditional Meera in from of his mother. Veronica then promptly wants to change everything about her caracter and become more like Meera. But by then the other two sides of the triangle have seen god in each other.

In fact I couldn’t see what Gautam saw in Meera (Diana Penty) either. She is bland as boiled water. The “ideal” indian girl who  cooks the meals and straightens the covers in the bedroom shared by the other two, while employed in one of the best firms in her field. What she sees in Gautam is a mystery as well.

Veronica’s absolute disintegration in a scene that starts with them going out to party is fabulous, and completes the destruction of her rebellious nature that begins with her putting on Meera’s clothes. Its a sad loss.

In short, whichever one of them wins, it had to be a triumph of “Adarsh Nari”. I wanted some stronger female traits to win here, but both were more than willing to making massive sacrifices for a guy aptly described as a “Pig” at one point in the film. All that guy has to do is be a guy. Never questioned, always desirable. This traditional misogyny was not expected from this team, and that soured what was a really solid film. This misogyny is nowhere near on the same level as that in low brow blockbusters of recent times, but when you invite the audience to come in carrying brains as well as hearts, you get deeper scrutiny.

PS: Notice the length of shots, some are really long, and well done. Dialogues are superb.  And by the way, its an intelligent film, and deserves to be seen.